Like, interest, and suppression of opinion from personal possibilities

Like, interest, and suppression of opinion from personal possibilities

Gonzaga, Grams. C., Haselton, M. G., Smurda, J., Davies, M. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Development and you can Human Behavior, 29(2), 119–126.

Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. M. (2000). The area out of attachment for the peoples mating. Article on General Psychology, 4(2), 186–204.

Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, Good. (2002). Sites contradiction reviewed. Diary away from Societal Activities, 58(1), 49–74.

Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, Meters., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Sites contradiction: A personal tech you to decreases social engagement and you can emotional really-being? Western Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.

Kreider, Roentgen.M., & Sphere, J. Meters. (2001). Matter, timing, and you can time of marriages and you will divorces. Most recent Inhabitants Reports, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: You.S. Census Bureau, 2005).

Lemieux, Roentgen., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional research away from intimacy, interests, and you may commitment: Testing brand new assumptions of your triangular principle away from love. Mental Profile, 90(step three,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.ninety.step 3.1009-1014

Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Elizabeth. (2004). Perception greatest regarding undertaking tough: Social comparisons within this personal relationships. Log regarding Identity and you can Social Psychology, 87(1), 80–95.

Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A., & Gailliot, Yards. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: The newest implicit cognition off romantic rivalry. Log from Personality and you may Public Mindset, 97(1), 74–87.

An excellent. (2001)mitment and you can relationships maintenance systems

Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A good., & Gonzaga, Grams. C. (2008). Automated inattention in order to attractive selection: The fresh new developed therapy away from relationships fix. Progression and you can Human Conclusion, 29(5), 343–349.

pold, B. Elizabeth. (1981). Sequential analysis off disagreement and accord inside the troubled and you will nondistressed marital lovers. Log regarding Consulting and you will Health-related Psychology, 49(4), 554–567.

McKenna, K. Y. An effective., Eco-friendly, Good. S., Gleason, M. J. (2002). Relationships formation on the web: What’s the big attraction? Record out of Personal Things, 58(1), 9–29.

Some great benefits of self-confident illusions: Idealization together with design out of satisfaction for the intimate relationship

Neff, L. A., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Self-investigations aim into the romantic relationships: A style of all over the world improvement and specific confirmation. In the P. Noller & J. An effective. Feeney (Eds.), Understanding ents from the examination of partners communication (pp. 32–58). Ny, NY: Cambridge University Force.

Obegi, J. H. (2008). The introduction of the customer-therapist bond through the lens out-of connection theory. Psychotherapy: Idea, Lookup, Habit, Training, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330

Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The latest personal keeping track of system: Increased susceptibility to help you personal cues because the a transformative a reaction to social exclusion. Into the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The fresh personal outcast: Ostracism, social difference, getting rejected, and intimidation (pp. 213–226). New york, NY: Mindset Drive.

Penetrate, T., & Lydon, J. E. (2001). Internationally and you will particular relational designs in the exposure to public affairs. Diary away from Identification and you may Public Psychology, 80(4), 613–631.

Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A., Tran, S., ). Accessory and you can suggestions looking to inside the close dating. Identity and you will Personal Mindset Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.

Ross, L. R., & Spinner, B. (2001). General and certain connection representations during the adulthood: Is there a relationship?. Log Of Public And private Relationships, 18(6), 747-766. hvordan mГёder jeg kvinder pГҐ latin doi:407501186001

Rusbult, C. Age., Olsen, Letter., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. For the J. Harvey & An excellent. Wenzel (Eds.), Intimate close relationship: Fix and you will improvement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A beneficial. D. (2000). Projection in person impression certainly partners as a purpose of the brand new resemblance within their shared experiences. Identity And you can Public Therapy Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008

Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1980). Ramifications of salience off extrinsic perks to the liking and you may enjoying. Log out-of Personality and you can Social Mindset, 38(3), 453–460.

Leave a Reply